Model Activity Task Class 10 History Part 1 2 3

Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 : Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 : Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 | 10th Class History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 is given below. This WBBSE Class 10th History Model Task Activity Question and Answer, Notes Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 – From February 2022, multiple choice, short, very short and interesting questions and answers (MCQ, Very Short, Short, Descriptive Question and Answer) will be released in West Bengal Class 10th Ten X History Examination – Very Important for West Bengal 10th Class History Examination. Those of you who are looking for Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 – Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part-2 February 2022 questions and answers can read the questions and answers given below.

Class 10 History Model Activity Task Part 2 February 2022 Solution

(a) Why Lalan Fakir is memorable?

Answer: Lalon Fakir was a multi-talented Bengali. He was a spiritual Baul saint, social reformer, humanitarian, philosopher, composer and singer of many wonderful songs. Lalan is considered one of the pioneers of Baul music and is also referred to as the ‘Baul Emperor’. He did not believe in discrimination of people according to religion, caste, caste, caste, gender etc. Actually care was a humanist, imbued with non-sectarian spirit who is known even today as Lalan Sai, Lalan Shah, Mahatma Lalan etc.

(b) What is Bethune’s role in Western education?

Answer: John Eliot Drinkwater Beaton (Bethoon Sahib) was one of the liberals who played an important role in the development of western education in Bengal in the nineteenth century. Barolat came to India as Law Minister to Lord Dalhousie in 1848 AD. He emphasized on western education through mother tongue. Established a women’s college in Calcutta for the promotion of modern higher education. Today it is known as Bethune College. Also her role in establishment of Female Juvenile Society, Calcutta Public Library etc. is commendable. This great man died in Calcutta on 12 August 1851 AD.

(c) Why did divisions arise in the Brahmo society?

Answer: Brahmo Samaj was the pioneer of the religious reform movement in Bengal and India in the 19th century. Raja Rammohan Roy founded Brahma in 1887 AD based on the monotheistic principles of the Upanishads. It later (1830 AD) came to be known as Brahmo Samaj. Initially the objective was to establish the Brahmo Samaj

(i) To worship the one and unique Brahman.

(ii) To protect Hinduism from the attacks of Christian missionaries.

(iii) Reestablishment of Bengali Electric Hinduism.

(iv) Eradication of superstitions and injustices practiced in the name of Hinduism.

After the death of Raja Ram Mohan Roy, the Brahmo Samaj movement became dull. The Brahmo Samaj was led by Devendra Nath Tagore. He breathed new life into the Brahmo movement. Devendranath Tagore’s greatest contribution is that he formulated the rules, religion, code of conduct etc. of the Brahmo Samaj. As a result of his work, the national movement got an organizational form.

However, the Brahmo movement became more dynamic when Keshav Chandra Sen joined the Brahmo Samaj in 1857 AD. But within a few days, due to the differences between Devendranath Tagore and Keshav Chandra Sen, there was a rift in the society. First, ‘Adi Brahmo Samaj’ (1866 AD) led by Debendranath Tagore, ‘Indian Brahmo Samaj’ (1866 AD) led by Keshav Chandra Sen, ‘Navabidhan Brahmo Samaj’ (1880 AD) and ‘General Brahmo Samaj’ led by Shivnath Shastri Anandmohan Bose were formed.

(d) Discuss the limitations of ‘Bengal Renaissance’.

Answer: Introduction: Due to the beginning of the rational and humanist movement of the middle class Bengali society in the 19th century due to the contact with the western civilization, great changes were observed in all aspects of religion, society, education, literature, philosophy, political life, which historians have accused as ‘Bengal Renaissance’. did

There is no end to the differences of opinion in the Pandit circles about the Bengali renaissance. According to some, the renaissance of Bengal in the nineteenth century was largely urban. A large section of the common people did not join the Renaissance. According to some, there was a big difference between the European Renaissance and the Bengali Renaissance.

Eminent Pandit Ashok Mitra called the Bengali renaissance the so-called Navjagaran. According to him, common people had nothing to do with this renaissance, while researcher Suprakash Roy said that the actual movement of Bengal in terms of economic, social and culture was very different and opposite to the movement in Europe.

Professor Sumit Sarkar has criticized Bengali renaissance as a fake history. According to Binoy Ghosh, Bengal’s renaissance is just a myth. He criticized this renaissance as a historical fraud. He said that there was no renaissance in Bengal, what has been written is only an exaggeration.

Leave a Comment